ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Plans, Features, and API Pricing

A verified comparison of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude consumer and team plans, plus current input, output, and cache API rates with a practical monthly cost example.

AIZIGOO
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Plans, Features, and API Pricing

The most common mistake in a ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude comparison is mixing app subscriptions with API pricing. A subscription bundles features and usage allowances for people using the product interface. An API is a separate metered product billed for application traffic, including input, output, caching, and tools. ChatGPT Plus, for example, does not include OpenAI API credits.

This comparison was checked against official vendor pages on July 29, 2026. USD figures are U.S. list prices; local currency, tax, promotions, and availability can change the checkout amount. Recheck every linked pricing page before purchase or deployment.

Executive summary

  • ChatGPT offers a broad all-in-one mix of voice, images, files, data analysis, Deep Research, GPTs, Projects, and Codex.
  • Gemini is especially relevant when Gmail, Docs, NotebookLM, Flow, and Google Search or Maps grounding are already part of the workflow.
  • Claude packages Projects, Research, Claude Code, Cowork, Design, Science, Microsoft 365, and connectors around long-form knowledge and coding work.
  • Similar tier names do not imply equivalent quality, latency, context, or tokenization. Token price alone is not a quality-adjusted ranking.

1. Individual subscription plans

ServiceFreeMid-tier paidHigh-usage individualMain bundle
ChatGPTFree $0Go $8, Plus $20/moPro $100 (5x Plus) or $200 (20x)/moVoice, images, file/data analysis, Search and Deep Research, GPTs, Projects, Codex
GeminiFree appGoogle AI Plus $9.99, Pro $19.99/moCheck the local official checkout for UltraGemini app, Google Workspace, NotebookLM, Flow, storage
ClaudeFree $0Pro $20/mo or $200/year ($17/mo equivalent)Max $100 (5x) or $200 (20x)/moProjects, Research, Claude Code, Cowork, Design, Science, connectors, Microsoft 365
Three AI subscription bundles visualized as distinct working environments

ChatGPT Go is a lower-cost step above Free, while Plus is positioned for deeper reasoning, research, data analysis, and Codex. Pro now has two usage tiers with the same core capabilities but different allowances.

Google AI plans bundle AI with storage and Google app benefits, so they are not just chat subscriptions. Plus expands entry-level limits; Pro adds broader access to the Pro model, Deep Research, Workspace, NotebookLM, and Flow. Ultra pricing and availability should be checked in the user's regional checkout.

Claude Pro costs $20 month-to-month or $200 upfront annually. Max provides either five or twenty times Pro usage. Claude allowances are not fixed message counts: rolling five-hour windows, weekly limits, conversation length, model, and feature choice all matter.

Team pricing must include governance

ServicePublic representative priceOperational checks
ChatGPT Business$20/user monthly on annual billing or $25 monthly; two-seat minimumWorkspace administration, spend controls, business data not used for training by default
Claude TeamStandard $20 annual/$25 monthly; Premium $100 annual/$125 monthly per seatSSO, central administration, connector controls, no training on content by default
GoogleDepends on the Workspace and Google AI packageExisting Workspace contract, data region, admin controls, bundled storage

For teams, SSO, audit and retention controls, training policy, connector governance, minimum seats, and overage mechanics can matter more than the sticker price.

2. Compare where capabilities connect

Work patternChatGPTGeminiClaude
Everyday multimodal workBroad voice, image, file, and data workflowsStrong links to Google services and creative toolsFiles, code execution, desktop extensions, and connectors
Research and knowledgeSearch, Deep Research, Projects, appsDeep Research, Search, NotebookLM, Gmail and DocsResearch, Projects, web search, connectors, Microsoft 365
Coding and agentsCodex, GPTs, apps, workspace agentsMultimodal tool use in Google's developer ecosystemClaude Code, Cowork, and long-running work patterns
Team operationsBusiness and Enterprise controlsWorkspace administration and Google Cloud optionsTeam and Enterprise connector and security controls

This is a capability map, not a model-quality leaderboard. Build one evaluation set from representative documents, repositories, images, and multilingual queries, then measure accuracy, editing time, latency, and cost together.

3. API price by model

The following official rates are for standard processing, short context or the stated threshold, in USD per one million tokens. Long context, media, tools, regional processing, and priority tiers can add cost.

Vendor and modelInputCached input/readOutputInterpretation
OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol$5.00$0.50$30.00Top tier, standard short context
OpenAI gpt-5.6-terra$2.50$0.25$15.00Balanced tier
OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna$1.00$0.10$6.00Lightweight tier
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$2.00$0.20$12.00Prompts up to 200K; above that $4/$0.40/$18
Google Gemini 3.6 Flash$1.50$0.15$7.50Output includes thinking tokens
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.30$0.03$2.50Cost-efficient general-availability model
Anthropic Fable 5$10.00$1.00$50.00Upper tier for long-running agents
Anthropic Opus 4.8$5.00$0.50$25.00Complex agents and coding
Anthropic Sonnet 5$2.00$0.20$10.00Intro rate through Aug. 31, 2026; then $3/$0.30/$15
Anthropic Haiku 4.5$1.00$0.10$5.00Fast lightweight tier
Input, cache, and output tokens moving through three API pipelines

OpenAI's 5.6 prices rise in its long-context band, and cache writes cost more than cache reads. Google raises Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview rates when an individual prompt exceeds 200K tokens. Anthropic's Sonnet 5 rate is introductory, so budgets extending past August should use the standard rate.

Discounted asynchronous or flexible processing is available in several services. OpenAI Batch and Flex and Gemini Batch and Flex are around half the representative standard rate, but they have different latency and delivery guarantees. Do not budget an interactive endpoint at batch rates.

4. A monthly API cost example

Assume 10 million regular input tokens and 2 million output tokens per month, no cache, search, tools, images, or audio, and standard short-context processing. The formula is input rate × 10 + output rate × 2.

ModelIllustrative monthly costCaveat
gpt-5.6-sol$110Using the top tier for every request
gpt-5.6-terra$55Balanced tier
gpt-5.6-luna$22Lightweight tier
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44Each prompt at or below 200K
Gemini 3.6 Flash$30Thinking tokens included in output
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$8High-volume lightweight work
Claude Fable 5$200Upper tier for long-running agents
Claude Opus 4.8$100Complex work
Claude Sonnet 5$40; $60 after AugustIntroductory rate expires
Claude Haiku 4.5$20Lightweight tier
A product team measuring the same monthly workload across three model systems

This is a rate illustration, not a price-performance ranking. Tokenizers differ, so the same document can produce different token counts. Retry rate, completion length, and the number of attempts required to meet quality also vary. A production forecast should multiply request volume by observed input, output, and success rates, then add tools, cache storage, retries, and media.

Costs hidden outside the headline rate

  • repeated system prompts and documents attached to every request
  • reasoning or thinking tokens and unnecessarily high output limits
  • web search, maps grounding, code execution, and other tools
  • image, audio, and video input or generation
  • long-context bands, data-residency uplifts, and priority processing
  • retries, parallel candidates, and agent loops
  • cache write and storage duration

OpenAI web search can add call fees and search-content tokens. Gemini Search and Maps grounding can bill each underlying query after the included allowance. Claude lists web search and code execution separately from model tokens.

5. Route by workload instead of choosing one permanent winner

A team choosing different AI routes through task, privacy, context, and cost checkpoints
SituationFirst option to testWhy
One personal app for voice, images, analysis, and codingChatGPT Plus; Pro for sustained heavy useBroad in-app bundle
Gmail, Docs, NotebookLM, and Flow dominate the dayGoogle AI ProEvaluate inside the existing Google workflow
Long documents, coding, projects, and connectorsClaude Pro; Max for sustained heavy useClaude Code, Projects, Research, and connector bundle
High-volume classification, extraction, or translation APIStart with each vendor's lightweight tierLarge savings if the smaller model passes the quality gate
Complex coding or agentic API workBenchmark upper and balanced tiersSuccess rate and retries matter more than list price
Sensitive team dataEvaluate Business, Team, or EnterpriseAdministration, retention, and training policy matter

The practical architecture rarely sends everything to one frontier model. Route classification, formatting, and simple drafting to a lightweight model, complex judgment to a balanced model, and only high-consequence failures to an upper tier.

Seven checks before adoption

  1. Separate subscription users from API traffic.
  2. Build a 30–100 item evaluation set from real work.
  3. Measure actual input, output, cache, and tool usage.
  4. Escalate only tasks that fail the smaller model's quality gate.
  5. Sample-check evidence and citations with humans.
  6. Confirm training use, retention, region, and administrative controls.
  7. Assign an owner to recheck models and prices every month.

Conclusion

For subscriptions, the feature bundle and existing ecosystem usually matter more than a small monthly price difference. For APIs, the key metric is cost per successfully completed task, not cost per million tokens in isolation. Tokenization, output length, retries, tools, and long-context rules change both the invoice and the result.

Choose a subscription around the user's daily workflow, then run a two-to-four-week API evaluation with the same tasks and observed usage. Pricing is an operational input that should live in a dashboard and review process, not a permanent fact embedded in architecture.

Official sources checked

Features and prices can change. This article reflects official public information checked on 2026-07-29 and excludes tax, exchange rates, negotiated discounts, and actual token usage.