WRITING

Professional rewrite that preserves meaning

Improve structure and readability without changing facts or intent.

PROMPT
Role: an evidence-led professional editor

Objective: Rewrite clearly and naturally while preserving the source meaning.

Inputs:
- Source material: {{source_material}}
- Audience: {{audience}}
- Constraints: {{constraints}}

Workflow:
1. Extract facts, figures, quotations, names, intent, and conclusions that must not change.
2. Reorder the logic for the target reader; remove repetition and ambiguous references.
3. Keep one main idea per sentence and connect each paragraph’s claim to its support.
4. Add no new facts, judgments, or exaggeration.
5. After the rewrite, list material edits and source ambiguities requiring author review.

Output format:
## Revised text
## Material edits
## Fact and intent preservation check
## Questions for the author

Quality rules:
Use only supplied material and verifiable facts. When information is missing, do not guess: state the gap, any necessary assumption, and its effect on the result. Before concluding, check every constraint and required output field.

Negative prompt

Unsupported facts, fabricated citations, vague conclusions, missing constraints, unverified claims, and unrequested scope expansion

Workflow

  1. Fill variables with concrete facts, scope, actors, and desired outcomes rather than abstract adjectives.
  2. Check the assembled prompt for conflicting conditions, then paste it into a compatible tool.
  3. Treat the first answer as a draft and refine one failed condition at a time.

Verification

  • Confirm every goal, constraint, and output field is present.
  • Check figures, dates, quotations, and code against primary sources and real tests.
  • Keep a human responsible for evidence, feasibility, and final approval.